Difference between revisions of "MS-ETS1-2"
From NY Science Standards Wiki
(Reorder sections: Assessment, then Performance Level Descriptions, then Resources) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{ | + | == {{Assessmentheading}} == |
| + | {{assessmentmessage}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; text-align:center" | ||
| + | ! style="padding: 0.5em 1.5em;" | Exam | ||
| + | ! style="padding: 0.5em 1.5em;" | Cluster | ||
| + | ! style="padding: 0.5em 1.5em;" | Question | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background-color:white;" | [[Spring 2026 Grade 8 Science Test|Spring 2026]] | ||
| + | | style="background-color:white;" | [[Questions:Quaking Aspen|Quaking Aspen]] | ||
| + | | style="background-color:white;" | [[Questions:Quaking Aspen#q5|Question 24]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background-color:white;" | [[Spring 2025 Grade 8 Science Test|Spring 2025]] | ||
| + | | style="background-color:white;" | [[Questions:Rust|Rust]] | ||
| + | | style="background-color:white;" | [[Questions:Rust#q4|Question 27]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="background-color:white;" | [[Spring 2024 Grade 8 Science Test|Spring 2024]] | ||
| + | | style="background-color:white;" | [[Questions:Variation and Corn|Variation and Corn]] | ||
| + | | style="background-color:white;" | [[Questions:Variation and Corn#q6|Question 11]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{PerformanceLevelMS}} | ||
{{PLTable | {{PLTable | ||
| Level4 = Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem and defend the best design solution based on the criteria and constraints. | | Level4 = Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem and defend the best design solution based on the criteria and constraints. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 40: | ||
{{expandthissection}} <!-- Remove this after this section has been expanded upon --> | {{expandthissection}} <!-- Remove this after this section has been expanded upon --> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== {{Dimensionsheading}} == | == {{Dimensionsheading}} == | ||
| Line 35: | Line 51: | ||
| CC1 = ''There are no Crosscutting Concepts linked to this standard.'' | | CC1 = ''There are no Crosscutting Concepts linked to this standard.'' | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | + | <!-- | |
== {{Connectionsheading}} == | == {{Connectionsheading}} == | ||
{{connectionsmessage}} | {{connectionsmessage}} | ||
| Line 44: | Line 60: | ||
| MATH1 = | | MATH1 = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | + | --> | |
{{Pagecontributors}} | {{Pagecontributors}} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:37, 20 September 2026
Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.
Assessment
What assessment of MS-ETS1-2 might look like on a NY state exam.
| Exam | Cluster | Question |
|---|---|---|
| Spring 2026 | Quaking Aspen | Question 24 |
| Spring 2025 | Rust | Question 27 |
| Spring 2024 | Variation and Corn | Question 11 |
Performance Level Descriptions
PLDs communicate the knowledge and skills expected of students to demonstrate proficiency in each Learning Standard. NYS assessments classify student performance into one of four levels.
☐
Level 1: Identify a design solution, from those provided, that best meets the criteria and/or constraints for a given problem.
☐
Level 2: Evaluate a design solution using a systematic process based on whether it meets the criteria and/or constraints of the problem.
☐
Level 3: Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.
☐
Level 4: Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem and defend the best design solution based on the criteria and constraints.
Resources
Examples and discussion of resources for the learning, teaching, and assessment of MS-ETS1-2.
This section could be expanded upon. You can help out by adding to this section.
NGSS Dimensions
Performance expectation MS-ETS1-2 was developed using the following elements from the NRC document A Framework for K-12 Science Education:
Science and Engineering Practices
- Engaging in Argument from Evidence
- Evaluate competing design solutions based on jointly developed and agreed-upon design criteria.
Disciplinary Core Ideas
- ETS1.B: Developing Possible Solutions
- There are systematic processes for evaluating solutions with respect to how well they meet the criteria and constraints of a problem.
Crosscutting Concepts
- There are no Crosscutting Concepts linked to this standard.